Tortie Portfolio Review: 28.7.2006
Monday, July 31, 2006
Our acting managing director sold half of tortie's position on 17.7.2006, wrong move!
Subsequently, after the panic had settled, Tortie bought Pelikan on 20/7/2006 at RM2.96 and CYMAO at RM0.955 at 21/7/2006. Cash balance is RM13791.81 at this moment. Tortie may increase exposure to SUIWAH, and may repurchase PBB.
To date, the portfolio value is RM50451.81, a mere 0.9% gain. A dissappointing underperformance. Let's hope for a better tomorrow :)
posted by winpulse @ 10:20 AM, ,
Tortie Portfolio: Plenitu - 11July2006
Thursday, July 13, 2006
PLENITU (5075) closed high at RM1.49 today, achieving a stunning 22% half year gain. Its highest price on 2006 was RM1.72 on the 3/5/2006, which was a nice-looking market condition before the global market adjustment. Follow by the correction, PLENITU dropped to RM1.33 and then has bounced back and still at its uptrend now.
Despite the RHB research today has downgraded call for PLENITU from BUY to HOLD based on the underweight stance and expectation on an imminent economic slowdown in 2007, we still maintain our BUY call for medium and long term. The reason is simple: strong balance sheet (RNAV of RM4.21, PE of 4, healthy EPS growth), attractive cash-in-hand (RM0.44/share) and enormous land bank (can keep the company busy for next 10-15 years).
Yesterday, PLENITU has just acquired RM25.96m worth of land at Pulau Penang. We see this as a proof that PLENITU is still keep on its strategy of accumulating land banks for future development. With a huge land bank, the future profits should be more guaranteed and sustainable. Based on the RHB research, due to its previous abandon status, the land was sold at 13% cheaper than the estimated market value. Moreover, PLENITU will not assume any liabilities from the previous project. This land is definitely a good buy.
posted by winpulse @ 12:46 PM, ,
Bunnie Porfolio: 4th of July 2006
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
BUNNIE | (Started at RM20,000 AT 6/6/06) | (4/7/2006) | |||||||
COUNTER | DATE PURCHASED | PR | AMOUNT | TOTAL | BALANCE | MKT PRICE | PROFIT/ LOSS | ||
1 | GTRONIC | 6/6/2006 | 0.30 | 10000 | 3016.80 | 10000 | 0.32 | 183.2 | |
2 | MAYBANK-CA | 20/6/2006 | 1.04 | 3000 | 3138.35 | 3000 | 1.13 | 251.65 | |
3 | LEADER | 22/6/2006 | 0.395 | 10000 | 3972.17 | 10000 | 0.405 | 77.83 | |
4 | JAKS | 22/6/2006 | 0.525 | 10000 | 5280.15 | 10000 | 0.545 | 169.85 | |
5 | MIDF | 4/7/2006 | 1.00 | 4000 | 4022.40 | 4000 | 1.00 | -22.4 | |
TOTAL | 19429.87 | 660.13 | |||||||
CASH BALANCE | 570.13 | 3.30% |
posted by winpulse @ 2:39 PM, ,
Investment - 4 - Dummies: STAOW & Investment Part I: Rule Number One
Monday, July 03, 2006
I don't know if Warren Buffet had ever studied Sun-Tze Art of War. But his key saying of
posted by winpulse @ 9:01 AM, ,
Bunnie Portfolio: Maybank-CA or Maybank-CB?
Ex-Price | Mkt Pr | Maybank Pr | |
Maybank-CA | 9.70 | 1.10 | 10.60 |
Maybank-CB | 10.00 | 0.55 | 10.60 |
At a glance, Maybank-CB appears to offer a gearing of >20, which is double that of CA.
However, it is more likely to be an illusion.
Let's consider the 'what-if' situation of various Maybank prices and calculate the value of the options.
Premiums are ignored to simplify the calculation.
From the table, it appears that Maybank-CB offers slightly better return only when Maybank's price is more than RM12.00.
Given the short expiry date of both warrants, WINPULSE is of opinion that Maybank-CA is the better choice.
posted by winpulse @ 8:49 AM, ,